Prof Roasted for Nothing

“At issue is whether the professor, Robert Oscar Lopez, tried to retaliate against students who accused him of creating a ‘hostile learning environment’ for conducting a conference last year in which participants expressed opposing views about children’s rights, among other issues.” Cheryl Wetzstein

College Professor Who Opposes Gay Marriage in Limbo

Students see children’s rights forum as ‘hostile

Cheryl Wetzstein,  The Washington Times, November 23, 2015, p. 25

A tenured, conservative Christian pro­fessor in California — who was raised by lesbian mothers but opposes same-sex mar­riage — is waiting to hear what action his university employer will take against him in its finding that he tried to “intimidate” students who sought to complain about his teaching about family matters.

At issue is whether the professor, Robert Oscar Lopez, tried to retaliate against stu­dents who accused him of creating a “hostile learning environment” for conducting a conference last year in which participants expressed opposing views about children’s rights, among other issues.

Mr. Lopez, associate professor of English and classics at California State University; Northridge, said he did not engage in any adverse actions against any students who attended his English and Greek and Roman mythology classes more than a year ago.

Instead, the students in question received A grades in his classes — and he did nothing to impede their activities at the university or to lodge complaints with its Office of Equity and Diversity, Charles S. LiMandri, president and chief counsel of the Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund, said in an Oct. 22 letter to CSU Provost Yi Li.

“Under these circumstances, we have no choice but to conclude that the disposition of this investigation is a purely political and ideological attack on Dr. Lopez for holding— and exposing his students to — ideas about children’s rights … which are apparently unpopular at the university, Mr. LiMandri wrote to Mr. Li, who is also vice president for academic affairs at the university.

Mr. LiMandri further asked the univcrsitv to reconsider its actions and reverse its find­ing of retaliation against Mr. Lopez.

The matter is under discussion at the university.

Mr. li responded to an inquiry from The Washington Times, saying the university “is fully committed to upholding academic freedom and free speech, as well as the right of our students to brine forth concerns. Any investigation resulting from student com­plaints follows established CSU protocol and is conducted on the basis of determining whether or not there has been a violation of university policy.”

“We take issue with the accuracy of the allegations currently circulating relating to tliis investigation, but as this is a confidential personnel matter that involves confidential student information, we cannot discuss or disclose the details,” Mr. Li said.

“However, we can share our core prin­ciples. We have a long history of welcoming a diversity of perspectives and champion­ing free thought and discourse within our academic environment, while ensuring that this environment is free from discrimination, harassment and retaliation,” the provost said

The complaints stem from a 2014 con­ference on children’s rights that Mr. Lopez organized at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library and that he included as an option in the syllabi for his classes.

About 110 of his 160 students attended the “Bonds That Matter” conference and heard presentations by five women — both conservatives and feminists — on divorce, adoption and children’s rights, including rights to know one’s biological mother and father. At least one student raised the issue of gay parents with a conference speaker during the question-and-answer period.

Based on that discussion, the now-former student in May (about six months after the conference) filed a formal complaint against Mr, Lopez, accusing him of creating a “hos­tile learning environment: on the basis of render and sexual orientation,” according to an Oct, 16 notice provided to Mr. Lopez by CSU officials.

In its Oct 16 notice, the university told Mi; Lopez that, after a lengthy investigation, it was dismissing the complaint about a “hostile learning environment.”

But it said there was sufficient evidence that the professor “attempted to intimidate and prevent” certain students “from ex­ercising their rights” to report Vhat they perceived to be a hostile learning environ­ment” stemming from the conference and subsequent class discussions about it.

Mr. Lopez has since asked to personally present his rebuttal to CSU officials. Uni­versity policy, for instance, says students should “attempt to resolve their concern” with a faculty member before making a formal complaint.

Mr. Lopez “was following this process in this case, and is now falsely accused of retaliation for doing so,” Mr. LiMandri wrote.

If the university takes disciplinary action, it could be demotion, suspension without pay or dismissal, Mr. Lopez told The Times.

Mr. Lopez, an executive board member of the International Children’s Rights Institute and a biogger at, has written about children’s rights for years, partly because of his experiences growing up with his loving lesbian mother and her partner, but apart torn his biological father.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: